 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Message
to citizens:
Judges
are placing sex offenders in our community whether we like it or
not. We have a public safety mess, and treatment won't cure the
sex offender.
What
do we do about it?
A
group of volunteer citizens is working with the legislature and
others to create a place for sex offenders to live (not next door
to you). There is a solution that is humane, safe for everyone,
and cost effective.
Please
call or email us, and we will give you the specifics of what we
are doing. We need you.
Please
join our Citizen
Run Sex Offender Housing Study Group.
303.504.6188
socr@about-the.org
Current
active members:
Gerry Moore President
Carrie Clein
Sarah Costa
Liz George
Tess Henry
Peggy Rudden
Diane Wolta
|
|
 |
Convicted
sex offenders live everywhere throughout our communities and we
know that they continue to re-offend, even while on probation
and in treatment. We want to create a facility to control adult
repeat sex offenders who engage in hands-on assaults.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| NEW!
Criminal Justice Crime Funnel |
|
A graphic representation:
For hands-on sex offenses committed -- what percentage are reported,
what percentage lead to an arrest, what percentage lead to a conviction,
what percentage result in a sentence to probation, and what percentage
result in a sentence to prison. Download
document (164k PDF)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Good
News - We CAN find a place for SOCR within metro area! |
|
C. Adam Foster
and David Miller wish to present the following regarding the relationship
between municipal ordinances, home rule and statewide concern. The
conclusion is that legislation for the creation of SOCR should be
successful from the perspective of challenges based on home rule
concerns because sex offenders and their management are clearly
statewide concerns that trump home rule and municipalities' interest
in implementing local zoning regulations.
The following
excerpt provides some additional background on recent Colorado Supreme
Court cases defining the extent of home rule sovereignty under the
Colorado State Constitution. The discussion of the holding in Northglenn
v. Ibarra is particularly instructive, because in that case the
Colorado Supreme Court held that state statutes governing the placement
and treatment of juvenile sex offenders raised statewide concerns
that controlled over contrary provisions in a City of Northglenn
zoning ordinance.
|
| |
Download
full siting issues analysis document (32k PDF) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Analysis
of Constitutional Issues Arising from SOCR |
| Questions
Presented: |
| A) |
Under
the United State Constitution, what is the permissible standard under
which SOCR can detain sex offenders before they are released into
the next stage of parole? |
| B) |
Is SOCR's use of polygraphs in violation of the United States Constitution? |
| C) |
Is
SOCR's use of penile plethysmography in violation of the United States
Constitution? |
| Short
Answers: |
| A) |
The
Constitution gives SOCR broad authority to detain sex offenders until
that offender's sentence ends, although the Due Process Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment may require SOCR to afford minimum due process
rights to sex offenders when determining if they are to be released
into the next stage of supervision or regressed into the Department
of Corrections. |
| B) |
SOCR's
use of polygraph tests could face constitutional challenges; however,
these challenges can be avoided if SOCR conforms its use of polygraph
test to established Fifth Amendment requirements. |
| C) |
SOCR's use of penile plethysmography could face challenges under the
First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, though with adequate
pre-administration procedures, it satisfies all of these. |
| |
Download
full Constitutional Issues analysis document (84k PDF)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|

10/10/2005
Separation proposed for sex offenders: Rapists and molesters should
be isolated under close supervision, an expert in treatment says.
"A pioneer in managing sex offenders in Colorado is proposing
an idea to put most rapists and child molesters in enclaves called
Sex Offender Containment and Research facilities, where they would
live apart from the rest of society."
By Kirk Mitchell
Go
to DenverPost.com to read this entire article about SOCR >
|
|
|
| |
|

Outside the
Walls Ministries "sees the need" for SOCR.
"We embrace the idea SOCR has introduced that sexual predators
be given a chance to live in a controlled environment and have the
privilege to serve their sentence while paying back the State for
the expense of this managed facility." Pastor Anthony
John Costa
Read more in
the October 2005 SOCR Newsletter > (144k)
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|